The Universe could be twice as old as current estimates, according to new research from the University of Ottawa that challenges the dominant cosmological model and resolves the ‘impossible early galaxy’ problem without requiring the existence of primordial black hole seeds, massive population III stars etc.
”Our newly-devised model stretches the galaxy formation time by a several billion years, making the Universe 26.7 billion years old, and not 13.7 as previously estimated,” said University of Ottawa’s Professor Rajendra Gupta.
For years, astrophysicists have calculated the age of our Universe by measuring the time elapsed since the Big Bang and by studying the oldest stars based on the redshift of light coming from distant galaxies.
In 2021, the age of our Universe was thus estimated at 13.797 billion years using the Lambda-CDM concordance model.
However, many scientists have been puzzled by the existence of ancient stars like Methuselah that appear to be older than the estimated age of our Universe and by the discovery of early galaxies in an advanced state of evolution made possible by the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope.
These galaxies, existing a mere 300 million years or so after the Big Bang, appear to have a level of maturity and mass typically associated with billions of years of cosmic evolution.
Furthermore, they’re surprisingly small in size, adding another layer of mystery to the equation.
Fritz Zwicky’s tired light theory proposes that the redshift of light from distant galaxies is due to the gradual loss of energy by photons over vast cosmic distances. However, it was seen to conflict with observations.
Yet Professor Gupta found that by allowing this theory to coexist with the expanding Universe, it becomes possible to reinterpret the redshift as a hybrid phenomenon, rather than purely due to expansion.
In addition to Zwicky’s tired light theory, he introduces the idea of evolving coupling constants, as hypothesized…
Read the full article here