Wordle, which just celebrated its 1,000th puzzle, might be the headline-grabbing star of The New York Times’ online game stable, but Connections, released last June, is its dark horse. Lately, I’ve been finding myself much more thrilled when I finish a Connections puzzle without making any mistakes than when I solve Wordle in just a few guesses.
The name describes it well. Connections is a game where you pick four words that have a connection to each other, and do this four times, until all 16 words in the puzzle are grouped. The tough part is that Times associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu chooses words that could fit in multiple groups. The obvious guess — hey! those are four animals! — is almost always going to be wrong.Â
There are four different difficulty levels in each game — each group of four fits in one. Yellow is the easiest, then green, then blue, and the hardest is purple, smugly labeled “tricky” by the NYT gamesters. If you make four mistakes, you lose, and the game shows you the answers.
And Connections indeed loves to trick you. One puzzle included the words “Sponge,” “Bob,” “Square” and “Pants,” but those words didn’t fit in the same category. All of them went in separate groups. Another wanted you to group together the words “Expose,” “Rose,” “Pate,” and “Resume,” as four words that are pronounced differently with accent marks. If you saw that one coming, you’re a better Connections player than I.
One of my favorite jokes about Connections comes from a tweet by Jelisa Castrodale, who wrote, “I do the NYT’s Connections every morning and then spend the rest of the day hating myself because I didn’t realize those four names were all doomed whaling ships built in 1832.” Yep, that’s pretty much my life.
I’ve written a lot about Wordle — from best starter words to a helpful two-step strategy to controversial word changes. I’ve even rounded up what I learned playing the hit online word puzzle for a full year.Â
But Connections plays on a different…
Read the full article here